Hong Kong – The Office of The Ombudsman has removed all past direct investigation reports from its website and introduced a new disclaimer restricting their publication, raising concerns from the journalism community over declining transparency.
Reporters testing the revamped site found that while public access to past reports is now limited, copies can still be obtained upon request. However, a strict condition applies — the materials are for personal use only, and any intent to quote or publish them may require legal consultation. The Ombudsman advises individuals to ‘consult a lawyer before dissemination.’
Previously, the Ombudsman made its investigation reports publicly accessible with fewer restrictions. The disclaimer now includes a bold note that unauthorised dissemination is prohibited, signalling a potential legal grey area for journalists and researchers referencing public documents.
The Hong Kong Journalists Association (HKJA) voiced concern, stating the shift ‘takes us back 20 years’ in terms of information accessibility. They argue that it hampers the media’s ability to scrutinise government departments and hold them accountable.
When questioned, the Ombudsman stated that the reports are still accessible upon application and the new terms are designed to prevent misinterpretation and out-of-context citation. Nonetheless, the change has sparked a debate on whether a balance can still be struck between institutional caution and public interest.
Media advocates warn that if other public bodies adopt similar restrictions, it could mark a broader retreat from government transparency and public oversight.