“It was determined that the state neglected its duty … resulting in the violation of the human rights of adoptees protected by the constitution and international agreements during the process of sending a lot of children abroad,” South Korea’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission said.
The country remains one of the biggest ever exporters of babies in the world, having sent more than 140,000 children overseas between 1955 and 1999.
International adoptions began after the Korean War as a way to remove mixed-race children, born to local mothers and American GI fathers, from a country that emphasised ethnic homogeneity.
It became big business in the 1970s to 1980s, bringing international adoption agencies millions of dollars as the country overcame post-war poverty and faced rapid and aggressive economic development.
More recently, the main driver has been babies born to unmarried women, who still face ostracism in a patriarchal society, and according to academics, are often forced to give up their children.
In a landmark announcement, the country’s truth commission concluded after a two-year and seven-month investigation that human rights violations occurred in international adoptions of South Korean children, including “fraudulent orphan registrations, identity tampering, and inadequate vetting of adoptive parents.”
It also said “numerous cases were identified where proper legal consent procedures” for South Korean birth parents were “not followed.”
The commission also said Seoul failed to regulate adoption fees, allowing agencies to set them through “internal agreements,” effectively turning it into a profit-driven industry.
And despite regulations requiring verification of adoptive parents’ eligibility, an overwhelming majority, 99 percent, of intercountry adoption approvals in 1984 alone were granted on the same day or the following day, the commission said, citing its investigation.
“These violations should never have occurred,” the commission’s chairperson Park Sun-young said.
“This is a shameful part of our history,” she added.
For years, Korean adoptees have advocated for their rights, many reporting that their birth mothers were forced to give up their children, leading to the fabrication of records to make them legally adoptable.
Some South Korean birth parents and adoptees even claimed that their children were kidnapped – by agents who sought out unattended children in poor neighbourhoods – or that authorities directed lost children towards adoption without trying to reunite them with their families, in some cases intentionally changing the child’s identity.
Some adoptees – such as Adam Crapser – were deported to South Korea as adults because their American parents never secured their US citizenship.
The commission confirmed human rights violations in only 56 out of 367 complaints, saying there was an overwhelming amount of data to try to verify, and said it would “make efforts” to review the remaining cases before its investigation expires on May 26.
Some adoptees were dissatisfied with this outcome, urging the commission to fully recognise violations in all 367 cases.
“Without the truth, our lives rests upon guesses, estimations and creative narratives,” Boonyoung Han, a Danish Korean adoptee, said.
“We are victims to state violence but without a trace! Literally. Destruction and withholding of our documents must not leave us open to eternal uncertainty.”
Hanna Johansson, a Korean adoptee in Sweden, said she considers the commission’s announcement a “victory” for her adoptee community regardless.
“I also hope that more and more South Korean [birth] parents who lost their child without their consent will come forward and demand justice,” she said. (AFP)
“It was determined that the state neglected its duty … resulting in the violation of the human rights of adoptees protected by the constitution and international agreements during the process of sending a lot of children abroad,” South Korea’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission said.
The country remains one of the biggest ever exporters of babies in the world, having sent more than 140,000 children overseas between 1955 and 1999.
International adoptions began after the Korean War as a way to remove mixed-race children, born to local mothers and American GI fathers, from a country that emphasised ethnic homogeneity.
It became big business in the 1970s to 1980s, bringing international adoption agencies millions of dollars as the country overcame post-war poverty and faced rapid and aggressive economic development.
More recently, the main driver has been babies born to unmarried women, who still face ostracism in a patriarchal society, and according to academics, are often forced to give up their children.
In a landmark announcement, the country’s truth commission concluded after a two-year and seven-month investigation that human rights violations occurred in international adoptions of South Korean children, including “fraudulent orphan registrations, identity tampering, and inadequate vetting of adoptive parents.”
It also said “numerous cases were identified where proper legal consent procedures” for South Korean birth parents were “not followed.”
The commission also said Seoul failed to regulate adoption fees, allowing agencies to set them through “internal agreements,” effectively turning it into a profit-driven industry.
And despite regulations requiring verification of adoptive parents’ eligibility, an overwhelming majority, 99 percent, of intercountry adoption approvals in 1984 alone were granted on the same day or the following day, the commission said, citing its investigation.
“These violations should never have occurred,” the commission’s chairperson Park Sun-young said.
“This is a shameful part of our history,” she added.
For years, Korean adoptees have advocated for their rights, many reporting that their birth mothers were forced to give up their children, leading to the fabrication of records to make them legally adoptable.
Some South Korean birth parents and adoptees even claimed that their children were kidnapped – by agents who sought out unattended children in poor neighbourhoods – or that authorities directed lost children towards adoption without trying to reunite them with their families, in some cases intentionally changing the child’s identity.
Some adoptees – such as Adam Crapser – were deported to South Korea as adults because their American parents never secured their US citizenship.
The commission confirmed human rights violations in only 56 out of 367 complaints, saying there was an overwhelming amount of data to try to verify, and said it would “make efforts” to review the remaining cases before its investigation expires on May 26.
Some adoptees were dissatisfied with this outcome, urging the commission to fully recognise violations in all 367 cases.
“Without the truth, our lives rests upon guesses, estimations and creative narratives,” Boonyoung Han, a Danish Korean adoptee, said.
“We are victims to state violence but without a trace! Literally. Destruction and withholding of our documents must not leave us open to eternal uncertainty.”
Hanna Johansson, a Korean adoptee in Sweden, said she considers the commission’s announcement a “victory” for her adoptee community regardless.
“I also hope that more and more South Korean [birth] parents who lost their child without their consent will come forward and demand justice,” she said. (AFP)
